Why You Need to Move from Traditional Project Management Methods to Agile?
Projects usually
begin with a concept and as ideas come in, the documentation related to the
projects begins to get populated by various types of details - the viability
aspect, fund sourcing, the vision of the product, choosing the teams, etc.
These dynamics play a vital role in planning a project. But there is a limit
which can enormously affect the project success - the risks linked with
specific project - and even though experienced PM try their best to offer plans
for happening, in practice there is always a chance that you don’t have another
option like a plan B or C to handle the unforeseen situation that might come
over time when a project is confirmed.
Practically it’s almost impossible to plan an excellent project in which risk is not involved, they are going to be there and will arise when you least await them to do so.
Practically it’s almost impossible to plan an excellent project in which risk is not involved, they are going to be there and will arise when you least await them to do so.
Just like other
PM framework or strategy, PMs and Product owners have to handle the risk
mitigation to make sure that the project is successful.
Let's Look At The Risks Involved In Traditional Project Management
1. Identifying The Risks
You can avoid
the risk by finding out the occurrence
in the beginning; so the first step in risk management is to find out
the potential risks. When a project is inspected, the senior members of the
team carefully observing the documentation and try to recognize the risk areas.
Based upon the analysis, they might make changes when needed in the proposed
work processes and try to remove the risks before it happens. At time, if
system architects are employed to work for a team, they go through the whole
processes and present important pitfalls before the team so risks are dealt
properly. This applies same in the case of companies following traditional PM
methodology which might not have an in- built plan to handle the risk
mitigation.
Agile doesn’t have
any supply for finding the risks. When a project is imagined in Agile, the
product vision is explained by the project owner, who can be compared to a Project
Management in traditional management systems. The product owner is highly responsible for
the project outcome. They must try to spot the risks by going through the
project. The Product owner might take the help of other teammates, if it is
decided at that time. Its essential to know that even when Agile doesn’t
support any activity directly for spotting the risks, its working process is
more than enough in identifying risks at any project development stage.
2. Analysis
After detecting
the risks and analyzing them can be hard or easy depending on the complexity
and nature. The risks can be any type - development linked, conceptual,
operation, and also due to tech used to develop a project. Also PMs, decision
makers, stakeholders, subject matter experts must take part in technical
meetings to get a clear view into the main cause of the risk and how it must be
ideally handled. One of the most important subject to consider is risk
analysis. Businesses might have to hire someone who is well versed in the
subject to analyze project - related risks if the project is large or complex
in nature.
The risks in
Agile are analyzed when the team becomes conscious. The biggest benefit is that
the whole team collaborated and works hard to mitigate risks, rather than an
individual person, or a group of senior mates. Agile teams are self - managing
and self - organizing. Also, teams are cross - functional that is a single
teammate is capable of handling one or more activities.
Comments
Post a Comment